Reading students’ minds: design assessment in distance education
Abstract
This paper considers the design of assessment for students of design according to behaviourist versus experiential pedagogical approaches, relating these to output oriented as opposed to process oriented assessment methods. It is part case study and part call to recognise the importance of process in design education and how this might be applied in other design disciplines generally, through the use of visual thinking and assessment. Making use of experience gained from The Open University’s entry level design course, U101: Design Thinking, the main assessment software (CompendiumDS) is described and presented as an alternative to ‘convergent endpoint’ artefacts of assessment. It is argued that the software and assessment design allow the evaluation of ‘unseen thinking’, providing an immediate focus on process rather than deterministic or behaviourist outcomes on their own. Moreover, this evaluation can be applied at scale, without extensive changes to existing systems and may offer a compromise between measuring outcomes and the value of student-centred learning experiences.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Boling, E. (2010). The Need for Design Cases : Disseminating Design Knowledge The Need for Design Cases : Disseminating Design Knowledge. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 1–8.
Colomina, B., Choi, E., Galan, I. G., & Meister, A.-M. (2012). Radical Pedagogies in Architectural Education. Architectural Review. Retrieved July 07, 2013, from http://www.architectural-review.com/essays/radical-pedagogies-in-architectural-education/8636066.article
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0
Gleeson, J., & Donnabháin, D. Ó. (2009). Strategic planning and accountability in Irish education. Irish Educational Studies, 28(1), 27–46. doi:10.1080/03323310802597291
Howard, C. D. (2011). Writing and Rewriting the Instructional Design Case : A View from Two Sides Writing and Rewriting the Instructional Design Case : A View from Two Sides. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 2(1), 40–55.
Ison, R. (2000). Supported open learning and the emergence of learning communities. The case of the Open University UK. In R. Miller (Ed.), Creating Learning Communities. Models, Resources, and New Ways of Thinking about Teaching and Learning (pp. 90–96). Foundation for Educational Renewal, Inc. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/37380/
Jones, D., & Lloyd, P. (2013). Which way is up? Space and Place in virtual learning environments for design. In J. Beate Reitan, P. Lloyd, E. Bohemia, L. Merete Nielsen, I. Digranes, & E. Lutnæs (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers (pp. 552–563). Oslo: ABM-media as c/o Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/37622/
Lawson, B. (1980). How designers think (1st ed., p. 216). Architectural Press.
Lloyd, P. (2011). Does Design Education Always Produce Designers? In Conference for the International Association of Colleges for Art, Design and Media (CUMULUS) (Vol. Paris, p. tbc).
Lloyd, P., & Jones, D. (2013). Normal Creativity: What 1,038 t-shirts can tell you about design education. In J. Beate Reitan, P. Lloyd, E. Bohemia, L. Merete Nielsen, I. Digranes, & E. Lutnæs (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers (pp. 303–316). ABM-media as c/o Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/37621/
Robinson, K. (2010). Changing Paradigms. Retrieved from http://www.thersa.org/events/video/archive/sir-ken-robinson
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner (First., p. 345). San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
U101 Course Team. (2013). U101: The Design Thinking Blog: Main page. U101: The Design Thinking Blog. Retrieved July 07, 2013, from http://designthinking.typepad.com/dialogues/
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v7i1.158
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.