Supporting more inclusive learning with social networking: A case study of blended socialised design education
Abstract
This paper presents a qualitative case study of socialised blended learning, using a social network platform to investigate the level of literacies and interactions of students in a blended learning environment of traditional face-to-face design studio and online participatory teaching. Using student and staff feedback, the paper examines the use of a web-assisted model of assessment, participation and publication as a mechanism for measuring the effectiveness of inclusive learning when supported by the constructs of social interaction. This paper describes the analysis of qualitative data to develop a preliminary theoretical framework of the social affordances of web-assisted teaching environments to support the changing demands of student literacies, cultural competencies and learning needs. The framework aims to support future models of online learning and facilitate further research into mediated design education.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning. Learning, 41(2), 32–44.
Andersen, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0?: ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology & Standards Watch. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2002). Flexible learning in a digital world. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 17(3), 217-230.
Donath, J., & boyd, D. (2004). Public Displays of Connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.
Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended Learning: Let's get beyond the hype. LTI Newsline: Learning and Training Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.ltinewsline.com/ltimagazine/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=11755
Jusoff, K., & Khodabandelou, R. (2009). Preliminary study on the role of social presence in blended learning environment in higher education. International Education Studies, 2(4), 79-86.
Ochsner, J. K. (2000). Behind the mask: A psychoanalytic perspective on interaction in the design studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 53(4), 194-206.
Osborne, L., Franz, J., Savage, S., & Crowther, P. (2011). Dichotomy in the design studio: Adapting to new blended learning environments. ICERI2011 Proceedings CD, IATED, Madrid, Spain, pp. 5579-5588.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
Roberts, G. R. (2005). Technology and learning expectations of the net generation. In D.G. Oblinger & J.L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 3.1-3.7). Washington, DC: Educause.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14, (3), 51-70.
Schnabel, M. C., & Ham, J. J. (2011). The social network virtual design studio: Integrated Design learning using blended learning environments. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, pp. 589-598.
Tu, C. H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-learning, 1(2), 34-45.
Yildiz, S. (2009). Social Presence in the Web-Based Classroom. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(1), 46.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v6i3.127
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.