Involvement, Collaboration and Engagement – Social Networks through a Pedagogical Lens

Tami Seifert

Abstract


Social networks facilitate activities that promote involvement, collaboration and engagement. Modelling of best practices using social networks enhances its usage by participants, increases participants confidence as to its implementation and creates a paradigm shift to a more personalized, participatory and collaborative learning and a more positive attitude towards its implementation. The contribution of the study described in this paper resides in the enhancement of teaching and learning methods that make use of the social network environment and shifts the focus of learning from the teacher to the learner. This breaks down the boundaries of time and place for teaching and learning. Another contribution is the strengthening of teachers’ personal and professional capabilities and the promotion of teaching-learning processes transpiring beyond the classroom boundaries by sharing contents, current communication, active learning and collaborative work. 


Keywords


social network, collaboration, engagement, social media

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Barr, R.B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 13-26.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay.

Bower, M., Hedberg, J. G., & Kuswara, A. (2010). A framework for Web 2.0 learning design. Educational Media International, 47(3), 177-198. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2010.518811

Bozarth, J. (2010). Social media for trainers: Techniques for enhancing and extending learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

Chickering, A.W. & Gamson, Z.F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7) 3-7.

Churches, A. (2009). Bloom’s digital taxonomy. Retrieved from http://burtonslifelearning.pbworks.com/f/BloomDigitalTaxonomy2001.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dabbagh, N., & Reo, R. (2011). Back to the future: Tracing the roots and learning affordances of social software. In M. J. W. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0 based e-Learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 1-20). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Johnson, L. A., Adams, S. S. & Cummins, M. (2012). The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.

Johnson, B. R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Keeves, J.P. (1988), Educational inspect methodology, as good as measurement: An international handbook. Oxford: Pergamon.

Kennelly, P. J. (2009). An online social networking approach to reinforce learning of rocks and minerals. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(1), 33-40.

King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30-35.

Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 30-42.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html

Poore, M. (2012). Using social media in the classroom: A best practice guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.‏

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

Puentedura, R. R. (2010). SAMR and TPCK: Intro to advanced practice. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/sweden2010/SAMR_TPCK_IntroToAdvancedPractice.pdf

Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/01/15/SAMRABriefContextualizedIntroduction.pdf

Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Rogers, P. C., Liddle, S. W., Chan, P., Doxey, A., & Isom, B. (2007). A Web 2.0 learning platform: Harnessing collective intelligence. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 16-33. Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/tojde/article/viewFile/5000102758/5000095853

Romrell, D., Kidder, L. C., & Wood, E. (2014). The SAMR Model as a framework for evaluating mLearning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(2). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1036281

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://ikit.org/fulltext/2006_KBTheory.pdf

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm

Sheely, S. (2006). Persistent technologies: Why can’t we stop lecturing online? In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Who’s learning? Whose technology? Proceedings of the 23rd ASCILITE Conference (pp. 769-774). Sydney, Australia: CoCo, University of Sydney. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p167.pdf

Sorrentino, J., (2007). Online education: Study shows social networking a boon for education. Education.com. Retrieved from http://www.education.com/magazine/article/online_ed

Windham, C. (2005). Educating the Net generation. Father Google & Mother IM: Confessions of a Net Gen Learner. E-book: EDUCASE, 43-58. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0552.pdf

Yildiz, M., & Hao, Y. (2009). Power of social interaction technologies in teacher education. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3049-3059). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i2.272
Abstract Views:
704
Views:
PDF
279

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.



Contact | Announcements | © Queensland University of Technology | ISSN: 1832-8342