Messy Design: Organic Planning for Blended Learning

Andrea Rankin; Jane Haggis; Ann Luzeckyj; Callum Gare

doi:10.5204/jld.v9i2.267

Messy Design: Organic Planning for Blended Learning

Andrea Rankin, Jane Haggis, Ann Luzeckyj, Callum Gare

Abstract

Educational planning and design processes are often described as messy but when modelled assume a tidy linearity that suggests they can be easily shared and transferred. In this paper we argue that a messy process does not mitigate against sharing and transfer and can in fact aid in developing a model that is reusable and authentic. We describe the design of an integrated and interactive blended learning environment for students while demonstrating that messiness does not necessarily preclude modelling. Drawing on Goodyear’s (2005) discussion of the use of patterns in educational design, our aim was to develop sustainable designs as a key feature, and to facilitate applicability across disciplines. By acknowledging a wicked view of design as a domain and using a rhizomatic metaphor to define and describe what we did, we provide a planning and design process for blended learning that is shareable, reusable and flexible while being neither ill-structured nor ill-defined.

Keywords

educational design; blended learning; planning and design processes

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agostinho, S., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L., Jones, J., & Harper, B. (2013). Learning designs as a stimulus and support for teachers’ design practices. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: designing for 21st (2nd ed., pp. 119-132). New York, USA: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/products/9780415539975

Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2015). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from two decades, 1994-2014. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne. Retrieved from https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/publications/the-first-year-experience-in-australian-universities-findings-from-two-decades-1994-2014/

Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age : Designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/products/9780415539975

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

Blackley, S., & Sheffield, R. (2015). Digital andragogy: A richer blend of initial teacher education in the 21st century. Issues in Educational Research, 25(4), 397-414. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier25/blackley-2.html

Chatteur, F. (n.d.). Patterns and pedagogies – approaches to developing e-learning environments. University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://web.arch.usyd.edu.au/~adong/students/Chatteur_Research_Proposal.pdf

Cober, R., Tan, E., Slotta, J., So, H.-J., & Könings, K. D. (2015). Teachers as participatory designers: two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments. Instructional Science, 43(2), 203-28. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11251-014-9339-0

Conole, G. (2013). Tools and resources to guide practice. In H. Beetham, R. Sharpe, & Routledge (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed., pp. 78-101). New York, USA: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/products/9780415539975

Cormier, D. (2011, November 5). Rhizomatic learning – why we teach? [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://davecormier.com/edblog/2011/11/05/rhizomatic-learning-why-learn/

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82-101. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/goodyear.html

Herrington, J. (2006). Authentic e-learning in higher education: Design principles for authentic learning environments and tasks. Paper presented at the E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University of Wollongong Research Online. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/24193/

Kift, S. (2009). Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance the first year student learning experience in Australian higher education. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-library?text=Articulating+a+Transition+Pedagogy+to+Scaffold+and+to+Enhance+the+First+Year+Student+Learning+Experience+in+Australian+Higher+Ed

Levy, P., Aiyegbayo, O., & Little, S. (2009). Designing for inquiry-based learning with the Learning Activity Management System. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 238-251. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00309.x/full

Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2004). First-year students' perceptions of capability. Studies in Higher Education, 29(1), 109-128.

Masterman, E., Walker, S., & Bower, M. (2013). Computational support for teachers’ design thinking: its feasibility and acceptability to practitioners and institutions. Educational Media International, 50(1), 12-23. http://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2013.777185

Masterman, L. (2013). The challenge of teachers’ design practice. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed., pp. 64–77). New York, USA: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/products/9780415539975

National Center on Universal Design for Learning. (n.d.). UDL Guidelines Version 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines

OpenLearn. (n.d.). Open education: 5.5 Rhizomatic learning. Retrieved from http://www.open.edu/openlearn/education/open-education/content-section-7.5

Torrisi-Steele, G. (2011). This thing called Blended Learning – a definition and planning Approach. In K. Krause, M. Buckridge, C. P.-I. Grimmer, & S. (Eds.), Research and Development in Higher Education: Reshaping Higher Education (Vol. 34, pp. 360-371). Retrieved from http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/42960/70212_1.pdf

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i2.267

Abstract Views:

431

Views:

PDF

119

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

_{Metrics powered by PLOS ALM}

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.