Reflection on Designerly Talk in Non-Pedagogical Social Spaces

Colin M. Gray, Craig D. Howard


This study was an early attempt to understand the kinds of talk students engaged in outside of the formal curriculum in student-run communities that enhanced their design learning. While this paper (Gray & Howard, 2014) has only been available for a relatively short time, it appears that there has been wide interest in the confluence of social media, design education, and learning opportunities that exist outside of the formal curriculum


design; designerly talk; CMC; CSCL; Facebook; social media

Full Text:



Bijker, W. E. (2001). Social construction of technology. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 23, pp. 15522-15527). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), Article 11. Retrieved from

Blevis, E., Lim, Y. K., Stolterman, E., & Makice, K. (2008). The iterative design of a virtual design studio. Techtrends: A Journal of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 52(1), 74-83.

Conanan, D. M., & Pinkard, N. (2001, March). Students’ perceptions of giving and receiving design critiques in an online learning environment. Paper presented at the European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (EURO-CSCL). Retrieved from

Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221-227.

Crysler, C. G. (1995). Critical pedagogy and architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 48(4), 208-217.

Dewey, John. (1934/2005). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Trade.

de Siqueira, A., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Temporal patterns in student-advisor instant messaging exchanges: Individual variation and accommodation. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42), Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.

Dutton, T. A. (1991). The hidden curriculum and the design studio: Toward a critical studio pedagogy. In T. A. Dutton (Ed.), Voices in architectural education: Cultural politics and pedagogy (pp. 165-194). New York: Bergin & Garvey.

Freire, P. (1970/2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Giddens, A., & Pierson, C. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making sense of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Gray, C. M. (2013a, November). Emergent critique in informal design talk: Reflections of surface, pedagogical, and epistemological features in an HCI studio. In Critique 2013: An international conference reflecting on creative practice in art, architecture, and design (pp. 341-355). Paper presented at the Critique 2013 Conference. Adelaide, South Australia.

Gray, C. M. (2013b). Informal peer critique and the negotiation of habitus in a design studio. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 12(2), 195-209.

Gray, C. M. (2013c). Personal and pedagogical factors that shape design thinking. Design and Technology Education, 18(3), 8-20.

Gray, C. M. (2014). Living in two worlds: A critical ethnography of academic and proto-professional interactions in a human-computer interaction design studio. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.

Gray, C. M. (2015). Critiquing the role of the learner and context in aesthetic learning experiences. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. W. Tracey (Eds.), The Design of Learning Experience: Creating the Future of Educational Technology (pp. 199-213). Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_14

Gray, C. M. & Howard, C. D. (2013, November). Expectations of reciprocity? An analysis of critique in Facebook posts by student designers. Paper presented at the Critique 2013 Conference. Adelaide, South Australia.

Gray, C., & Howard, C. (2014). Designerly talk in non-pedagogical social spaces. Journal of Learning Design, 7(1), 40-58. doi:10.5204/jld.v7i1.153

Gray, C. M., & Howard, C. D. (2015). “Why are they not responding to critique?”: A student-centered construction of the crit. In LearnxDesign: The 3rd International Conference for Design Education Researchers and PreK-16 Design Educators (pp. 1680-1700). Aalto, FI: Aalto University.

Gross, M., & Do, E. (1999). Integrating digital media in design studio: Six paradigms. Paper presented at the American College Schools of Architecture Conference, Minneapolis, MN.

Hara, N. (2009). Communities of practice: Fostering peer-to-peer learning and informal knowledge sharing in the work place. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers (pp. 115-136). New York: Springer.

Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. T. D. Schiffrin & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612-634). Oxford: Blackwell.

Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4, Article 1. Retrieved from

Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Howard, C. D. (2012a). Higher order thinking in collaborative video annotations: Investigating discourse modeling and the staggering of participation. Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University Bloomington.

Howard, C. D. (2012b). An instructional paradigm for the teaching of computer-mediated communication. Instructional Science, 40(3), 493-513. doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9187-0

Howard, C. D., Barrett, A. F. & Frick, T. W. (2010). Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre- service teachers’ comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. The Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 89-112.

Jeong, A. (2004). The combined effects of response time and message content on growth patterns of discussion threads in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 36-53.

Kvan, T. (2001). The pedagogy of virtual design studios. Automation in Construction, 10(3), 345-353.

Maher, M. L., & Simoff, S. (2000). Collaboratively designing within the design. Paper presented at the Co-Designing 2000 Conference.

Marra, R. (2006). A review of research methods for assessing content of computer-mediated discussion forums. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(3), 243-267.

Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Parrish, P. E. (2009). Aesthetic principles for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 511-528. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9060-7

Paulus, T. M. (2009). Online but off-topic: Negotiating common ground in small learning groups. Instructional Science, 37, 227-245.

Pena-Shaff, J., & Nichols, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussion. Computers and Education, 42, 243-265.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. London: RIBA Publications Limited.

Shaffer, D. W. (2003). Portrait of the Oxford design studio: An ethnography of design pedagogy. WCER Working Paper No. 2003-11. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52-59.

Willenbrock, L. (1991). An undergraduate voice in architectural education. In T. A. Dutton (Ed.), Voices in Architectural Education: Cultural Politics and Pedagogy (pp. 97-119). New York: Bergin & Garvey.

Wise, A. F., Perera, N., Hsiao, Y., Speer, J., & Marbouti, F. (2012). Microanalytic case studies of individual participation patterns in an asynchronous online discussion in an undergraduate blended course. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 108-117.

Abstract Views:

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Contact | Announcements | © Queensland University of Technology | ISSN: 1832-8342