Continuing my journey on designing and refining criterion-referenced assessment rubrics

Kelley Burton

Abstract


I am delighted that my 2006 article was in the top 10 most downloaded articles on the 10 year anniversary of the Journal of Learning Design. In 2006, when the article was written, I worked at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT). At that time, the development of criterion-referenced assessment rubrics was gaining momentum. In 2015, as I write this reflection, all 37 Australian universities that support a law school universally accept criterion-referenced assessment as opposed to norm-referenced assessment. This year, I started working at the University of the Sunshine Coast and I am proud to say that its assessment policy explicitly endorses the development of criterion-referenced assessment rubrics. I have published several journal articles on designing and implementing criterion-referenced assessment rubrics and it continues to be my quintessential research interest.


Keywords


criterion referenced assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andresen, L., Nightingale, P., Boud, D., & Magin, D. (1992). Strategies for assessing students. Kensington, Australia: Professional Development Centre, The University of New South Wales.

Australian Technology Network. (2000). Generic capabilities of ATN university graduates. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/title/generic-capabilities-of-atn-university-graduates/oclc/223603532

Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(1), 57-75.

Bond, L. (1996). Practical assessment, research & evaluation. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=2

Burton, K. (2006). Designing criterion-referenced assessment. Journal of Learning Design, 1(2), 73-82. doi:10.5204/jld.v1i2.19

Burton, K., & Cuffe, N. (2005). The design and implementation of criterion-referenced assessment in a first year undergraduate core law unit. Legal Education Review, 15, 159-175.

Carlson, T., MacDonald, D., Gorely, T., Hanrahan, S., & Burgess-Limerick, R. (2000). Implementing criterion-referenced assessment within a multi-disciplinary university department. Higher Education Research & Development, 19, 103-116.

Centre for the Study of Higher Education. (2002). A comparison of norm-referencing and criterion-referencing methods for determining student grades in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning/06/normvcrit6.html

Christensen, S., & Kift, S. (1997). Graduate attributes and legal skills. Legal Education Review, 11, 207-237.

Crooks, T. (1988). Assessing student performance. Kensington, Australia: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA).

Dunn, L., Morgan, C., O’Reilly, M., & Parry, S. (2004). The student assessment handbook. London: Routledge Falmer.

Huggins, A. (2015). Incremental and inevitable: Contextualising the threshold learning outcomes for law. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 38(1), 264-287.

Jackson, S. (2004). A project to facilitate the implementation of criterion-referenced assessment in the School of Law. Unpublished paper, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Johnstone, R. (2011). Whole-of-Curriculum Design in Law. In S. Kift, M. Sanson, J. Cowley & P. Watson (Eds.), Excellence and Innovation in Legal Education (pp. 1-29). Chatswood: LexisNexis.

Johnstone, R., Patterson, J., & Rubenstein, K. (1998). Improving criteria and feedback in student assessment in law. Sydney, Australia: Cavendish Publishing.

Kift, S. (1997). Lawyering skills: Finding their place in legal education. Legal Education Review, 8(43), 67-71.

Kift, S., Israel, M., & Field, R. (2010). Learning and Teaching Academic Standards Project: Bachelor of Laws Learning & Teaching Academic Standards Statement December 2010, Australian Learning & Teaching Council. Retrieved from http://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/456829/altc_standards_LAW.pdf

Le Brun, M., & Johnstone, R. (1994). The quiet (r)evolution improving student learning in law. Sydney, Australia: The Law Book Company.

Mueller, J. (2003). Authentic assessment toolbox – Rubrics. Retrieved from http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/rubrics.htm

Nathanson, S. (1987). Putting skills and transactions together in professional legal training. Journal of Professional Legal Education, 5(2), 187-200.

Newble, D., & Cannon, R. (1989). A handbook for teachers in universities and colleges: A guide to improving teaching methods. New York: Kogan Page.

Queensland University of Technology Teaching and Learning Committee. (2003). CRA implementation plan for assessment policy. Unpublished report, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Queensland University of Technology. (n.d.). Manual of policies and procedures. Retrieved from http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/C/C_05_01.jsp

Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.

Rust, C., Price, M., & O’Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147-164. doi: 10.1080/0260293032000045509

Scarino, A. (2005). Going beyond criteria for judging performance. Barbel: Journal of the Australian Federation of Modern Language Teachers’ Association, 39(3), 8-16.

Sumsion, J., & Goodfellow, J. (2004). Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: A critical evaluation, Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 329-346.

Teaching and Educational Development Institute (TEDI). (1999). Assessment criteria, standards and marking schemes. Retrieved from http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au/teaching/assessment/criteria.html




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v8i3.250
Abstract Views:
494
Views:
PDF
239

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.



Contact | Announcements | © Queensland University of Technology | ISSN: 1832-8342