Email this article 
Technology supported facilitation and assessment of small group collaborative learning in large 1st year classes
Abstract
Collaborative learning activities offer the potential to support mutual knowledge construction and shared understanding amongst students. Introducing collaborative tasks into large first-year undergraduate science classes to creating learning environments that foster student engagement and enhance communication skills is appealing. However, implementing group work in classes of over 1000 students presents challenges for instructors in terms of task design, group management and assessment. Interdisciplinary scenario-inquiry tasks have been designed for small group work in a large science cohort, informed by literature and current pedagogical practices relating to the integration of collaborative and active learning strategies. Facilitation and assessment of these tasks was perceived as too complex and time consuming for a single instructor to complete manually, so a web-based task management technology was developed. Evaluation of the technology supported collaborative group activities including peer assessment was conducted through questionnaires, student interviews and analysis of the artefacts of the learning process. The capabilities and limitations of the technology, and the insights into group learning gained through its use are presented. In general, students felt supported through the task. Evidence of resource interdependence was found between students in functional groups.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buchs, C., Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2004). Resource interdependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24(3), 291–314. doi: 10.1080/0144341042000211661
Buchs, C., Gilles, I., Dutrévis, M., & Butera, F. (2011). Pressure to cooperate: Is positive reward interdependence really needed in cooperative learning? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 135-146. doi: 10.1348/000709910X504799
Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2001). Effective strategies for cooperative learning. Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration In College Teaching, 10, 69–75.
Gahan, L., Lawrie, G., Matthews, K., Adams, P., Long, P., Kavanagh, L., & Weaver, G. (2011). IS-IT Learning? Online interdisciplinary scenario-inquiry tasks for active learning in large, first year STEM courses: Final report. Sydney, Australia: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Gillespie, D., Rosamond, S., & Thomas, E. (2006). Grouped Out? Undergraduates’ default strategies for participating in multiple small groups. Journal of General Education. 55(2), 81-102. doi: 10.1353/jge.2006.0022
Goodyear, P., Jones, C., & Thompson, K. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning: instructional approaches, group processes and educational designs. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 439 - 452). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_35
Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A. & Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 139-154. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09339057
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Ortiz, A. E., & Stanne, M. (1991). The impact of positive goal and resource interdependence on achievement, interaction and attitudes. Journal of General Psychology, 118(4), 341-347. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1991.9917795
Jones, C., & Hosein, A. (2010). Profiling students’ use of technology: Where is the net generation divide? International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society, 6(3), 43-58.
Jones, S. M., Yates, B. F., & Kelder, J.-A. (2011). Science learning and teaching academic standards statement. Strawberry Hills, Australia: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-learning-and-teaching-academic-standards-science-2011
Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for teachers.
Kavanagh, L., & Crosthwaite, C. (2007). Triple objective mentoring: achieving learning objectives with chemical engineering students. Institution of Chemical Engineers Transactions D, 2, 68-79.
Kelly, D., Baxter, J. S., & Anderson, A. (2010). Engaging first year students through online collaborative assessments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 535-548. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00361.x
Kennedy, G.E., Judd, T.S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K-L. (2008). First-year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108-122. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/kennedy.html
Kirschner, F., Paas, F. & Kirschner P.A. (2009a). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 31-42. doi: 10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2.
Kirschner, F., Paas, F. & Kirschner P.A. (2009b). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behaviour, 25, 306-314.
Kriflik, L., & Mullan, J. (2007). Strategies to improve student reaction to group work. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 4(1), 13–27.
Kuh, G. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges and Universities.
Lawrie, G., Gahan, L., Matthews, K., Adams, P., Kavanagh, L., Long, P., Weaver, G. & Cusack, R. (2011). Handbook of scenario resources for inquiry learning in STEM: IS-IT Learning? Online interdisciplinary scenario-inquiry tasks for active learning in large first year STEM courses. Surry Hills, Australia: Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC). ISBN: 978-0-642-78123-9.
Lawrie, G. A., Matthews, K. E., & Gahan, L. R. (2010). Forming groups to foster collaborative learning in large enrolment courses. In 16th UniServe Science Conference: Creating ACTIVE minds in our Science and Mathematics students (pp. 66-71). Sydney, Australia: Sydney University. Retrieved from http://ojs-prod.library.usyd.edu.au/indexer.php/IISME/article/view/4672/5472
Phillips, R., McNaught, C., & Kennedy, G. (2012). Evaluating e-learning: Guiding research and practice. New York: Routledge.
Phipps, M., Phipps, C., Kask, S. & Higgins, S. (2001). University students’ perceptions of cooperative learing: implications for administrators and instructors. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(1), 14-21.
Price, M., O'Donovan, B., & Rust, C. (2007). Putting a social constructivist assessment process model into practice: Building the feedback loop into the assessment process through peer feedback. Innovations in Teaching and Education International, 44, 143-152.
Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(1), 448-484. doi: 10.1002/sce.20306
Slavin, R. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory research and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87-101.
Smith, K. A. (2010). Social basis of learning: From small-group learning to learning communities. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 123, 11-22. doi: 10.1002/tl.405
Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2010). Innovating the 21st-Century university: It’s time! EDUCAUSE Review, 45(1), 16-29. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM1010.pdf
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416-426. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v7i2.204
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.