Scaling-Up Group Work Techniques for Teaching Large Information Systems Courses

Jarrod Trevathan, Trina Myers, Heather Gray

Abstract


Promoting engagement during lectures becomes significantly more challenging as class sizes increase.  Therefore, lecturers need to experiment with new teaching methodologies to embolden deep learning outcomes and to develop interpersonal skills amongst students.  Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning is a teaching approach that uses highly structured group work during lessons so that students construct content.  Each group member takes on a role for which the other group members rely on, and then the group reports back to the class.  This paper describes how group work was adapted for use in a large first year Information Systems course.  Quantitative and qualitative results suggest that students are receptive to group work, as the approach creates a relaxed, friendly and trusting community that is typically not present in classes that use a didactic teaching style.  We provide a discussion of lessons learned with regard to using group work in a large lecture theatre and give recommendations for how to improve interactivity amongst the class.


Keywords


Group work; active learning; student interaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bauersfeld, H. (1995). The structuring of the structures: Development and functioning of mathematics as a social practice. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 137-144). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Ben-Ari, M. (1998). Constructivism in computer science education. SIGCSE Bull., 30(1), 257-261.

Bransford, J. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

Davidson, R. (2012). Wiki Use That Increases Communication and Collaboration Motivation. Journal of Learning Design, 5(2), 38-49.

Douglas, E. P., & Chiu, C. (2012). Process-oriented Guided Inquiry Learning in Engineering. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56(0), 253-257.

Farrell, J. J., Moog, R. S., & Spencer, J. N. (1999). A guided-inquiry general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 570.

Hanson, D., & Wolfskill, T. (2000). Process workshops - A new model for instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1), 120.

Hanson, D. M. (2006). Instructor's Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning. Lisle, IL: Pacific Crest.

Kahn, P., & Walsh, L. (2006). Developing Your Teaching, Ideas, Insight and Action. Routledge: Oxen 45-63.

Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational technology, 38(5), 20-23.

Moog, R. S., & Spencer, J. N. (2008). Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL). USA: American Chemical Society, Oxford University Press.

Myers, T., Monypenny, R., & Trevathan, J. (2012). Overcoming the glassy-eyed nod: An application of process-oriented guided inquiry learning techniques in Information Technology. Journal of Learning Design, 5(1), 12-22.

POGIL. (2012). Process-oriented guided inquiry learning. [Online]. Available: http://pogil.org/ (10 September, 2011).

Trevathan, J., & Myers, T. (2013). Towards Online Delivery of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning in Information Technology Courses. Journal of Learning Design, 6(2), 1-11.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v7i3.185
Abstract Views:
370
Views:
PDF
58

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.



Contact | Announcements | © Queensland University of Technology | ISSN: 1832-8342