The Importance of Learning Philosophies on Technology Selection in Education

George Hickey

Abstract


Educators are often overcome by the daily concerns of the classroom so they tend to focus on what has worked in the past. It seems a luxury to take the time to ask the more fundamental question: what is learning? Yet this question lies at the fore of our profession and defines our choice of teaching methods.

It has become a truism that social interaction is essential to the educational process. Furthermore, the ubiquity of technology, with its capabilities and its hold on users, has generated endless suppositions about its potential in education. We are told that technology is transforming education.

However, at the heart of education lies a philosophical schism about the nature of knowledge and learning. Technology choices depend on and will amplify our teaching philosophy, so examining our assumptions about teaching is essential when designing appropriate learning interventions.

This paper explores Socratic, behaviourist, and constructivist views of learning and explores how social interactions is framed within each of these theories. What types of interactions matter and how can we facilitate them utilising contemporary technology? It is proposed that learning philosophies are a fundamental but oft-overlooked consideration for teachers, who would do well to choose a particular model and apply complementary approac

 


Keywords


teaching; technology; Constructivism; Behaviourism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boghossian, P. (2006). Behaviorism, constructivism, and Socratic pedagogy. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 38(6), 713–722.

Gleick, J. (1997). Chaos: Making a new science [epub]. Vintage. Retrieved from Kobo.com

Gokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1). Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v7n1/gokhale.jte-v7n1.html?ref=Sawos.Org

Hayward, R. (2008). Leading a digital school: A case study - St Leonard’s College. In M. Lee & M. Gaffney (Eds.), Leading a Digital School Principles and Practice (pp. 80–92). Melbourne, Australia: ACER Press

Issroff, K., & Scanlon, E. (2002). Using technology in higher education: an activity theory perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 77–83. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00213.x

Kozulin, A. (2012). Foreword. In L. Vygotsky, Thought and language. MIT Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=B9HClB0P6d4C&oi=fnd&pg=PR4&dq=vygotsky&ots=TqL8VceaKt&sig=pI1n6aBfzZhSInk-1L11J0g7iCQ

Laurillard, D. (2008). The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 5–20. doi:10.1007/s11412-008-9056-2

Lumsden, C. J. (1983). Cultural evolution and the devolution of tabula rasa. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 6(2), 101–114. doi:10.1016/S0140-1750(83)80001-3

McLeod, S. (2007a). Behaviorism. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/behaviorism.html

McLeod, S. (2007b). Lev Vygotsky. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html

McLeod, S. (2009). Jean Piaget. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html

Moran, M., Searman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2012). How today’s higher education faculty use social media. Pearson Learning Solutions. Retrieved from http://dev.pearsonlearningsolutions.com/assets/downloads/pdfs/pearson-social-media-survey-2012-color.pdf

Rose, R. J. (1995). Genes and human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 625-654.

Sharples, M. (2005). Learning as conversation: Transforming education in the mobile age. In Proceedings of conference on seeing, understanding, learning in the mobile age (pp. 147–152). Retrieved from http://www.socialscience.t-mobile.hu/2005/Sharples_final.pdf

Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.ingedewaard.net/papers/connectivism/2005_siemens_ALearningTheoryForTheDigitalAge.pdf

Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2006. Retrieved from http://gerrystahl.net/cscl/CSCL_English.htm

Taleb, N. N. (2010). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable [epub] n.p.: Random House Trade Paperbacks. Retrieved from Kobo.com

Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v7i3.184
Abstract Views:
892
Views:
PDF
288

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.



Contact | Announcements | © Queensland University of Technology | ISSN: 1832-8342