The impact of applied cognitive learning theory on engagement with e-learning courseware

William Swann

Abstract


Since the emergence of e-learning in the 1990s, the craft of designing and developing online courseware has evolved alongside theoretical advances in the field.  A variety of media combinations have been applied to course pages by e-learning practitioners, making it possible to examine learning concepts emerging from the research in the light of learner responses.  This study explores learner perceptions of engagement following completion of 393 courses developed by a commercial e-learning provider.  Three media combinations are examined.  Each course selected for the sample applies one of the three combinations on the majority of content pages.  Responses from the 22,959 learners who completed post-training surveys are evaluated, with the goal of determining how learner engagement is influenced by the application of two cognitive learning principles -- the multiple representation principle and the split-attention principle.  Both principles are found to have limited impact on narrow audiences of internally motivated learners, but significant impact on engagement with broader audiences of learners who are assigned or required to take the training.  When applied in the field, these two cognitive learning principles dramatically broaden the audience of learners who feel engaged with the learning experience.

Keywords


e-learning; cognitivism; cognitive load; multimedia; engagement; sweller; mayer; instructional design

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Baddeley, A.D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 417-423.

Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.

Clark, J.M. & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-170.

Engle, R.W., & Roberts, J.S. (1982). How long does the modality effect persist? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 343-346.

Mayer, R.E. & Anderson, R.B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444-452.

Mayer, R.E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R. & Tapango, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 64-73.

Mayer, R.E. & Moreno, R. (1998a). A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.

Mayer, R.E. & Moreno, R. (1998b). A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Implications for design principles. http://www.unm.edu/~moreno/PDFS/chi.pdf

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

Penney, C.G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17, 398-442.

Sweller, J., Merrienboer, J. & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v6i1.119
Abstract Views:
680
Views:
PDF
400

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.



Contact | Announcements | © Queensland University of Technology | ISSN: 1832-8342