Sociocultural affordances of online peer engagement

Jill Willis, Kate Davis, Sally Chaplin

Abstract


University learning increasingly includes online learning experiences embedded within teaching with the dual policy intentions of increasing flexibility and learner engagement. In this research project, three university lecturers from different teaching contexts selected technologies for online learning to enhance learner engagement by encouraging peer learning. A sociocultural view of learning was used to conceptualise the technological and social affordances that might enable student peer participation and engagement. The research explored the question: “What are the benefits and barriers experienced by students engaging in online peer collaboration?”  Students reported benefits including a sense of belonging that enhanced motivation, and professional identity. This article also reports on some of the challenges for students and University academics when engaging in online learning communities.



Keywords


Learner engagement, peer learning, online learning, affordances

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ainley, M. (2004). What do we know about student motivation and engagement? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, 29 November - 2 December, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from www.aare.edu.au/04pap/ain04760.pdf

Bowen, S. (2005). Engaged learning: are we all on the same page?(analysis of teaching and learning). Peer Review, 7(2), 4(4).

Hung, D., Tan, S. C., & Koh, T. S. (2006). Engaged learning: making learning an authentic experience. In D. Hung & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Engaged learning with emerging technologies (pp. 29-48). Dordrecht: Springer.

Krause, K.-L. (2005). Understanding and promoting student engagement in university learning communities. Paper presented at the Sharing Scholarship in Learning and Teaching: Engaging Students, 21-22 September, Townsville, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/Stud_eng.pdf

Krause, K.-L., & Grimmer, C. (n.d.). Enhancing student engagement in the first year. Griffith Institute for Higher Education: Good Practice Guide Retrieved 17 August 2010, from http://www.griffith.edu.au/gihe/pdf/gihe_tipsheet_web_ese.pdf

La Trobe University. (2009a). Student Engagement Strategy 2009. Retrieved from http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/assets/downloads/Student%20Engagement%20Strategy%2009.pdf

La Trobe University. (2009b). What is student engagement? Retrieved from http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/student-engagement/

Macdonald, S. (2008). Blended learning and online tutoring: planning learner support and activity design. Burlington, VT: Gower.

Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students' need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323-367.

Reason, P. (2003). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry. (pp. 261 - 283). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

Taylor, E. W. (2008). Transformative learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2008(119), 5-15.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wertsch, J. (1993). Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v6i1.102
Abstract Views:
237
Views:
PDF
70

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.



Contact | Announcements | © Queensland University of Technology | ISSN: 1832-8342